If I were a professional golfer, I would have been told that my prediction was a ‘gimme’ based on how close I came to being accurate:
Here’s the prediction I made about it at the end of 2014 about VOLT 2.0:
4). Chevrolet VOLT 2.0: a lower cost VOLT 1.0?
With the battery re-engineered to provide more storage with fewer battery cells (192 vs 288) this was expected.
But look at the 2015 Chevrolet Cruze and you get an idea of what the 2016 VOLT is going to look like: compact.
Frankly, it looks like a Honda Civic not a cutting edge EV – but that’s what GM’s research told the designers to do.
Range may improve modestly (45-50 electric miles) – right on the money! 50 EV miles from 18.4kWh battery.
but this vehicle will not be a game changer; it’s likely the vehicle that should have launched in 2011: $29,995 base price, Missed this one – looks like it’s going to stay at $34,995 before Federal Tax Credit.
2017 BOLT was shown to advertise the upcoming $30,000 price point AFTER the $7500 Federal Tax Credit.
Useable gauges, (yup). But the complaints were so high on VOLT 1.0 this had to be done. But Chevrolet fell back on its current GM cluster gauges so the WOW factor is now gone. Somewhat cool iPad/app based interface.
3 person “Cruze Sized” rear seat.
Middle seat is just a back cushion. Third passenger needs to ‘straddle’ the battery pack.
I hope there are more substantial surprises when the VOLT 2.0 is unveiled at the NAIAS the week of January 12, 2015: like using more than 60% of the 17.1kWh battery!
This did not happen. Larger battery but no change in useable capacity. Most disappointing: on board charger modestly increased from 3.3 to 3.6 kW. Gonna still be slow going charging VOLT 2.0.
You must be logged in to post a comment.